Olympics Shine Spotlight on 10 Refugees, while 65 Million live in Darkness
The Rio Olympics are occurring during the worst refugee crisis since WWII, when the concept of “refugee” was first uttered in International Law. For the first time ever, a team of refugee athletes is competing under the Olympic flag. While this sentiment is very moving, it raises more serious questions that many nations are trying to handle, while others condemn and vilify the victims of war-ravaged homelands.
The Olympic refugee team represents 65 million displaced refugees around the world escaping war, prosecution, famine and starvation. Some face double prosecution, with host countries that are unwelcoming, marking refugees as a threat instead of, people trying to forge a better life for themselves.
In a competition that typically celebrates national successes, the Refugee Olympics Team highlights national failures – the collapse of countries like Syria and South Sudan and the lack of progress by many countries to help resettle millions of refugees. The Olympics’ message of international cooperation has been muddied; the Refugee Olympic Team is, not only competing for medals, but competing for acceptance in their new home.
Olympic officials are carving out a place for refugees at a time when political leaders and candidates from the U.S. to Hungary are verbally attacking refugees refusing to admit them because of the alleged threats they pose.
The Olympic refugee team features 10 members, whom were all forced to leave their homelands, some were orphaned, only to be sent off to refugee camps in other host countries, while others ran away from war in search of a better life; sports gave them hope, taught them discipline and endurance. They are from Congo, Ethiopia, South Sudan and Syria.
Yusra Mardini, refugee Olympic athlete
Consider Yusra Mardini, who swam across the Aegean Sea to Europe when her boat sank while fleeing war in Syria. Rose Lokonyen is another member who at 7 years old was looking for a place to hide during the Sudanese Civil War, only to find the dead bodies of her grandparents.
Joining Mardini and Lokonyen are the other 8 members forming the 10-member team, backed by the UNHCR and the International Olympic Committee to bring global attention to the magnitude of the global refugee crisis and to act as a symbol of hope for refugees worldwide.
As Roger Cohen wrote in The New York Times, there’s a disturbing contrast between the world’s enthusiasm for Team Refugees and its apathy and antipathy for refugees as a whole: “They die at sea. They die sealed in the back of a truck. They die anonymous deaths. Fences are erected, walls mooted. … They represent danger and threaten disruption.”
Everybody wants to applaud refugee Olympians in Rio, Cohen observes, yet nobody wants to welcome refugees into their own country.
The Olympics Refugee Team represents a glimpse of optimism for themselves and for the 65 million refugees scattered all over the world. But, will the Olympics create more open borders and a lessening of the asylum backlogs in UK, Sweden, U.S. and the world?
A record, 1.3 million of refugees applied for asylum in the 28 member states of the European Union, Norway and Switzerland in 2015, nearly twice the previous record of 700,000 that applied in 1993 following the fall of the Soviet Union and Iron Curtain.
British claim 164 asylum seekers a day, a record. Even tiny Iceland received a record 50 asylum application in the month of January.
The rise of refugees into these countries has caused issues with violence in France, a backlog of all immigration in Sweden and the main reason behind the vote of Great Britain to leave the European Union. It is also fueling contention political debate in the US Presidential race.
Kudos to the Olympic Committee for its grand gesture to these athletes without a nation. But the tough question is what do we do for the other 64,999, 990?
A recent report by Michael Sainato from The Guardian highlights how President Trump’s latest immigration rules are creating serious issues for both workers and businesses in the United States. Published on July 29, 2025, the article shows the real-world effects of cutting work visas and permits, affecting many people’s daily lives and the overall economy.Immigration
Increased Public SupportAmerican public opinion toward immigration has grown more positive than it’s been in decades. A new Gallup poll shows 79% of Americans view immigration as a “good thing,” the highest share in 25 years. This shift in sentiment comes even as political leaders debate stricter policies, indicating a broad public appetite for legal
International students applying for or renewing a J-1 exchange visa in 2025 should be aware of several important changes introduced this year. Below is a concise guide focusing only on 2025 developments, including a brief pause in visa interview scheduling, new social-media screening rules, and special prioritization for J-1 physician applicants. Follow this guidance to
Past Trump Administration Efforts (2018–2020)During his first term, President Donald Trump publicly floated the idea of ending birthright citizenship – the constitutional guarantee under the 14th Amendment that anyone born on U.S. soil is automatically a citizen. In October 2018, Trump said he intended to issue an executive order to redefine or restrict birthright citizenship,